Abstract
Aims

The impact of positive clinical signs (xanthoma and/or family history) and positive familial hypercholesterolaemia (FH) mutation status on risk of coronary artery disease (CAD) over and above that predicted by low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol level alone has not been fully determined. We assessed whether positive clinical signs and genetic FH diagnosis affected CAD risk among subjects with significantly elevated LDL cholesterol levels (≥180 mg/dL, or ≥140 mg/dL in subjects <15 years of age).

Three genes causative for FH (LDLR, APOB, and PCSK9) were sequenced in 636 patients with severe hypercholesterolaemia (mean age, 45 years; 300 males [47%], CAD diagnosis, 185 [29%]), and the presence of clinical FH signs (xanthoma and/or family history) were assessed. CAD prevalence was compared between four subject groups categorized based on these parameters.

Compared with the reference group without FH mutations or clinical signs of FH, subjects with clinical signs of FH or FH mutations had three- to four-fold higher odds of developing CAD (odds ratio [OR], 4.6; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.5–14.5; P = 0.0011 and OR, 3.4; 95% CI, 1.0–10.9; P = 0.0047, respectively), whereas those with clinical signs of FH and FH mutation(s) had >11-fold higher odds of developing CAD (OR, 11.6; 95% CI, 4.4–30.2; P = 1.1 × 10⁻⁵) after adjusting for known risk factors including LDL cholesterol.

Our findings revealed an additive effect of positive clinical signs of FH and positive FH mutation status to CAD risk among patients with significantly elevated LDL cholesterol.